<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does NAC Imply Identity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seanconvery.com/weblog/2006/07/25/does-nac-imply-identity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seanconvery.com/weblog/2006/07/25/does-nac-imply-identity/</link>
	<description>Ruminations on Information Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:43:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Convery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NIdM, AIdM, and NAC</title>
		<link>http://www.seanconvery.com/weblog/2006/07/25/does-nac-imply-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Convery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NIdM, AIdM, and NAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanconvery.com/weblog/?p=32#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] No I didn&#8217;t intentionally try to start the day in acronym hell, it just sort of worked out that way. I&#8217;m sitting here at Digital ID World catching up on things and it appears that Eric Norlin is continuing his thoughts on a conversation started in July around NAC and its relationship to the identity management space in general. He writes: As I&#8217;m reading through the confusing acronyms (NAC, NAP, etc) - I&#8217;m wondering if it isn&#8217;t time for the group of innovative vendors in this space (Forescout, ConSentry, TNT, Identity Engines, Apere, Caymas, Juniper, etc) to rename their offerings with a more descriptive term: &#8220;Network Identity Management,&#8221; or &#8220;N-IdM.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No I didn&#8217;t intentionally try to start the day in acronym hell, it just sort of worked out that way. I&#8217;m sitting here at Digital ID World catching up on things and it appears that Eric Norlin is continuing his thoughts on a conversation started in July around NAC and its relationship to the identity management space in general. He writes: As I&#8217;m reading through the confusing acronyms (NAC, NAP, etc) &#8211; I&#8217;m wondering if it isn&#8217;t time for the group of innovative vendors in this space (Forescout, ConSentry, TNT, Identity Engines, Apere, Caymas, Juniper, etc) to rename their offerings with a more descriptive term: &#8220;Network Identity Management,&#8221; or &#8220;N-IdM.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

